🔗 Share this article

When I am a Dungeon Master, I traditionally shied away from significant use of chance during my D&D games. I preferred was for story direction and session development to be shaped by player choice instead of pure luck. That said, I chose to alter my method, and I'm very pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Watching an Improvised Tool

A popular podcast features a DM who often asks for "chance rolls" from the participants. He does this by choosing a polyhedral and assigning potential outcomes tied to the result. While it's essentially no distinct from consulting a pre-generated chart, these get invented on the spot when a character's decision lacks a predetermined conclusion.

I decided to try this approach at my own game, primarily because it appeared engaging and provided a break from my normal practice. The outcome were remarkable, prompting me to reflect on the perennial balance between planning and spontaneity in a D&D campaign.

A Memorable In-Game Example

During one session, my players had survived a massive battle. Afterwards, a player asked about two key NPCs—a brother and sister—had made it. Rather than choosing an outcome, I handed it over to chance. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The possible results were: a low roll, both were killed; on a 5-9, only one would die; on a 10+, they made it.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a incredibly moving sequence where the adventurers discovered the corpses of their friends, still holding hands in death. The cleric conducted funeral rites, which was especially meaningful due to prior roleplaying. In a concluding reward, I chose that the NPCs' bodies were suddenly transformed, showing a enchanted item. By chance, the item's contained spell was precisely what the party required to solve another pressing story problem. One just plan these kinds of magical story beats.

Honing On-the-Spot Skills

This event made me wonder if chance and thinking on your feet are truly the core of D&D. While you are a prep-heavy DM, your ability to adapt need exercise. Players reliably excel at ignoring the most detailed plans. Therefore, a skilled DM must be able to think quickly and create scenarios on the fly.

Employing similar mechanics is a excellent way to develop these skills without going completely outside your preparation. The trick is to use them for small-scale circumstances that won't drastically alter the session's primary direction. For instance, I would avoid using it to decide if the king's advisor is a traitor. Instead, I would consider using it to determine if the characters arrive right after a key action takes place.

Strengthening Shared Narrative

Luck rolls also helps maintain tension and foster the feeling that the story is dynamic, shaping in reaction to their decisions in real-time. It prevents the feeling that they are merely actors in a DM's sole narrative, thereby bolstering the cooperative foundation of roleplaying.

This philosophy has historically been part of the core of D&D. Early editions were filled with charts, which fit a playstyle focused on exploration. Although modern D&D frequently prioritizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, that may not be the required method.

Striking the Sweet Spot

There is absolutely no issue with thorough preparation. Yet, there is also no problem with relinquishing control and allowing the rolls to decide some things in place of you. Control is a big factor in a DM's role. We require it to facilitate play, yet we often struggle to release it, at times when doing so might improve the game.

The core recommendation is this: Have no fear of temporarily losing the reins. Embrace a little randomness for smaller story elements. It may find that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more powerful than anything you could have planned by yourself.