🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content appear to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."